Nothing is being seen through. An x-ray would need something to pass through the fabric and come back, and a photograph is a flat record of light that already bounced off it. What the model does instead is paint a plausible body using the parts of the picture that are visible.
If it were an x-ray, the result would be the truth about that person, and getting one wrong would be a bug. It is not, so a result is a convincing invention that happens to fit your photograph, and two runs of the same picture give two different bodies.
The practical consequence is that nobody, including us, can tell you what is actually under the clothes in a photograph, and no tool that claims to can either.
Outline, pose, light direction, skin tone where any skin is visible, and the way fabric falls. Those give it enough to place a body correctly. The more of them your photograph provides, the less it has to invent and the better the result looks.
Thick coats, loose clothing and strong backlight remove most of those cues at once, which is why the same mode that handles a summer photograph cleanly makes a mess of a winter one.
There is a photo mode that leans into the look deliberately, with the translucent effect the name suggests, rather than pretending to show a real body. It sits beside the plain undress modes in the catalogue.
Whichever you pick, the rules are the same: one adult who agreed, the upload deleted after the render, the result in your own gallery and nowhere else.
Which of the two to use is a question of what you are after. The translucent look keeps the clothing in the frame and reads as an effect applied to a photograph. The plain undress modes remove it from the scene entirely and read as a different photograph of the same person. The second is harder for the model and depends more on how much of the body the original picture gave it.
Fotix
Ao continuar, você aceita os Termos de Uso e a Política de Uso Aceitável.
Sair